Preseason Blog Series: A new Floored Baby and can you find Breakouts through draft value?
Michael welcomed baby Ruth
Ellis into the world last week. Big Brother George loves his little sister…but
only for about 5 seconds at a time.
--------
We’re coming down the home
stretch of the fantasy baseball offseason. Our draft is set for Sunday, March
28th, making keepers due on Thursday, March 25th. We’ve
already had 2 big keeper trades and there are still a number of moves available
to be made. Keith is the manager that remains most in need of a keeper upgrade and 4 or 5 teams have a spare keeper that becomes worthless in a week…so the
time is ripe for Keith to get a pretty good keeper for pennies on the dollar.
--------
The final draft strategy article
of the offseason is about how to find breakout players. This blog has
talked at length about the value of breakout players: they win you the league. Whether
you find them in the draft or on the free agent wire, if you can find players
who vastly outperform the price you paid to get them, you will win (hello,
keepers that you ‘draft’ in the 11th round that are 1st
and 2nd round players).
I had the thought experiment:
is there a correlation between draft day value and whether or not a player will
break out. Remember, the way I am identifying draft day value is a player who
is projected to put up stats better than their average draft position is
valuing them at.
Think about it, if DJ Lemahieu
is projected to hit 20 home runs with 7 stolen bases and a .290 average…but Jeff
McNieil is projected to do the same but at a draft price 60 picks lower, that
makes Jeff McNeil a value. This is the whole idea of using projections to find
draft day values.
But as we’ve noted in the
blog, projections and draft values only take you so far, you need to find
breakout players and avoid bust players to win the league. So how do we do that?
One thought I had was to try to find a correlation between these draft day
values and how often they breakout, so I looked at the projection and end of
season data from 2018 to 2020.
Criteria:
·
A draft day value:
someone projected 5 or more ranking spots from than their Average Draft
Position (ADP)
·
A draft day flat
value: someone projected between 0 and -5 ranking spots from than their ADP
·
A draft day not
value: someone projected worse than -5 rankings spots from their ADP
·
Breakouts: as
discussed in previous blogs, someone who performs 10% better than their projected
stat lines at end of season
·
Busts: someone
who performs 10% worse than their projected stat lines
·
Flat: someone who
performs within 10% of their projected stat lines
Running the data for the various projection systems (Steamer, ATC, THE BAT, DepthCharts, and Yahoo), pulling the average draft positions from each year from either Yahoo or the National Fantasy Baseball Championships website, and comparing the numbers to each year’s end of season data, here is how everything played out:
Draft Day Value |
Draft Day Flat |
Draft Day Not Value |
|||||||
Hitting |
%breakout |
%flat |
%bust |
%breakout |
%flat |
%bust |
%breakout |
%flat |
%bust |
2018 |
43% |
34% |
36% |
18% |
20% |
16% |
39% |
46% |
48% |
2019 |
46% |
40% |
46% |
13% |
15% |
9% |
41% |
45% |
45% |
2020 |
28% |
28% |
39% |
2% |
10% |
20% |
69% |
62% |
41% |
AVG |
39% |
34% |
40% |
11% |
15% |
15% |
50% |
51% |
45% |
Pitching |
%breakout |
%flat |
%bust |
%breakout |
%flat |
%bust |
%breakout |
%flat |
%bust |
2018 |
7% |
8% |
10% |
6% |
5% |
6% |
87% |
86% |
84% |
2019 |
6% |
16% |
19% |
28% |
29% |
3% |
58% |
71% |
78% |
2020 |
24% |
36% |
35% |
19% |
7% |
7% |
57% |
57% |
59% |
AVG |
12% |
20% |
21% |
17% |
14% |
5% |
67% |
72% |
74% |
Unfortunately, there isn’t too much of a correlation to be seen here. You notice that there are far higher percentages under the Draft Day Not Value columns, but the breakout/flat/bust underneath them are very well spread out. There are higher percentages under Draft Day Not Value because in a player pool of around 1000 players, but only 300 or so players that get drafted and have an Average Draft Position, some players ranked in the 500s may be projected better than those that get drafted in the 200s…leading to the player getting drafted in the 200s being a bad draft day value…but the inverse is very rarely true: the best projected players rarely don’t go undrafted.
What we were looking for here
is for there to be higher percentages under the % breakout or bust columns of
the draft day values or not values…but that isn’t the case. There does not
appear to be any correlation between whether or not a player is a value on
draft day and whether or not they will break out. Drafting "Draft Day Value" players, i.e. the Jeff McNeil's of the draft room will still give you a leg up on the league after draft day....they just won't get you a title on their own.
In future blogs we may try to
find a better statistic that has a correlation to find breakout players, but that
may have to wait until next offseason. Until then, keep shooting your shots to find the breakout players...but try to make them value picks along the way.
Comments
Post a Comment